<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>M19 Standard Deck &#8211; DEATHMARKED</title>
	<atom:link href="https://deathmarked.info/tag/m19-standard-deck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://deathmarked.info</link>
	<description>Magic: the Gathering Strategy, Decks and Other Stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 02:03:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Quick M19 Decklist: Mono Black Discard</title>
		<link>https://deathmarked.info/quick-m19-decklist-mono-black-discard/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=quick-m19-decklist-mono-black-discard</link>
					<comments>https://deathmarked.info/quick-m19-decklist-mono-black-discard/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Ian Alloso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 12:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Magic The Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Core Set 2019 Standard Decks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deck techs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M19 Standard Deck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raiders Wake M19 Standard]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathmarked.info/?p=11962</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have been checking on MTG Canada for blog topic ideas, and they have a variety of topics in several formats, as well as discussions on play strategies. I found one of their recent topic for Standard detailing the possible &#8230; <a href="https://deathmarked.info/quick-m19-decklist-mono-black-discard/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="fb-root"></div>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full" src="https://s22.postimg.cc/gzcmxvuv5/Quick_M19_Decklist_Mono_Black_Discard.jpg" width="575" height="225">I have been checking on MTG Canada for blog topic ideas, and they have a variety of topics in several formats, as well as discussions on play strategies. I found one of their recent topic for Standard detailing the possible return of the discard archetype in the format <span id="more-11962"></span>and based on this article <a href="http://www.mtgcanada.com/standard/adventures-in-standard-discard-makes-a-comeback/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">here</a>, I have come up with this decklist below:</p>
<p><em>Creatures</em><br />
4 Fell Specter<br />
2 Urgoros, the Empty One<br />
3 Dread Shade<br />
4 Kitesail Freebooter<br />
4 Dreamstealer</p>
<p><em>Spells</em><br />
2 The Eldest Reborn<br />
2 Torment of Hailfire<br />
4 Raiders&#8217; Wake<br />
2 Heartless Pillage<br />
1 Walk the Plank<br />
1 Cast Down<br />
3 Duress<br />
4 Harsh Scrutiny</p>
<p><em>Lands</em><br />
22 Swamp<br />
2 Cabal Stronghold</p>
<p><center><br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "ca-pub-2323336148464359";
/* Deathmarked content ad */
google_ad_slot = "1416605407";
google_ad_width = 300;
google_ad_height = 250;
//--><br />
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"><br />
</script></center></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://deathmarked.info/quick-m19-decklist-mono-black-discard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick M19 Deck: Doublecast Burn</title>
		<link>https://deathmarked.info/quick-m19-deck-doublecast-burn/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=quick-m19-deck-doublecast-burn</link>
					<comments>https://deathmarked.info/quick-m19-deck-doublecast-burn/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Ian Alloso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2018 03:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Magic The Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Core Set Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doublecast Burn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M19 Standard Deck]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathmarked.info/?p=11851</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[While sorting my files to work on at the office, a Standard deck idea popped in my mind again. This reminded me of a ruling post at the Magic Judge Tumblr account that is discussing on the rulings of the &#8230; <a href="https://deathmarked.info/quick-m19-deck-doublecast-burn/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="fb-root"></div>
<p><img alt="" decoding="async" src="http://deathmarked.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Quick-M19-Deck-Doublecast-Burn.jpg" alt="" width="575" height="226" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-11862" srcset="https://deathmarked.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Quick-M19-Deck-Doublecast-Burn.jpg 575w, https://deathmarked.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Quick-M19-Deck-Doublecast-Burn-300x118.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 575px) 100vw, 575px" /><br />
While sorting my files to work on at the office, a Standard deck idea popped in my mind again. This reminded me of a ruling post at the Magic Judge Tumblr account that is discussing on the rulings of the M19 card, Doublecast, in certain scenarios. I have checked if it is possible to fit the card into a purely Red Burn deck<span id="more-11851"></span>. Hence, the decklist below: </p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="http://gatherer.wizards.com/Handlers/Image.ashx?multiverseid=447273&#038;type=card" width="223" height="311" class="alignright size-full" /><em>Lands</em><br />
    21 Mountain<br />
    4 Canyon Slough</p>
<p><em>Spells</em><br />
    2 Abrade<br />
    2 The Flame of Keld<br />
    2 Tormenting Voice<br />
    4 Lightning Strike<br />
    3 Wizard&#8217;s Lightning<br />
    1 Fight with Fire<br />
    4 Shock<br />
    3 Sweltering Suns<br />
4 Doublecast<br />
4 Banefire<br />
2 Lava Axe</p>
<p><em>Planeswalkers</em><br />
  3 Chandra, Torch of Defiance<br />
   1 Jaya Ballard</p>
<p>There are two burn spell types if categorized: the core burn spells and situational burn spells.<br />
Here we have the core burn spells: Banefire, Lava Axe, Lightning Strike, Shock, Wizard&#8217;s Lightning, and here are the situational burn spells: Abrade, Fight with Fire.</p>
<p>The cards that will get you the gas once you are done with the first barrage of burn damage are Tormenting Voice, The Flame of Keld, Chandra, Torch of Defiance, and Jaya Ballard. The walkers take the role to also ramp up your mana for your Banefire or Kicked Fight with Fire. </p>
<p>The Saga enchantment is somewhat tricky in a sense that you will cast it with the max of one card in hand to discard. It can stay longer in hand if you have drawn your planeswalkers or your Banefires which you would to fire up with a lots of mana later on. You might want to cut it off the list if you weren’t comfortable with it. </p>
<p>I’d prefer to have zero creatures in the main deck so as to null their spot and mass removals which will take them more time to set up threats before you burn them out. </p>
<p>The Canyon Slough can be cycled in the late game but if ever you’d want to splash Black for access to discard spells like Doomfall and Duress, I would suggest you add Dragonskull Summit and cut four Mountains. </p>
<p>That is a wrap for this deck tech. For comments and suggestions, just hit em up on the box below. </p>
<p>Until the next post.<br />
<center><br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "ca-pub-2323336148464359";
/* Deathmarked content ad */
google_ad_slot = "1416605407";
google_ad_width = 300;
google_ad_height = 250;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script><br />
</center></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://deathmarked.info/quick-m19-deck-doublecast-burn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick M19 Decklist: U/R Conjecture</title>
		<link>https://deathmarked.info/quick-m19-decklist-blue-red-mirrari-conjecture/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=quick-m19-decklist-blue-red-mirrari-conjecture</link>
					<comments>https://deathmarked.info/quick-m19-decklist-blue-red-mirrari-conjecture/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Ian Alloso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 06:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Magic The Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blue Red Mirrari Conjecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M19 Standard Card Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M19 Standard Deck]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathmarked.info/?p=11758</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Taking a short break from my office work and grad school write-ups, I decided to brew one Standard deck with the upcoming Core Set 2019. The deck’s main strategy revolved around the Blue Saga: The Mirari Conjecture and I saw &#8230; <a href="https://deathmarked.info/quick-m19-decklist-blue-red-mirrari-conjecture/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="fb-root"></div>
<p><img alt="" loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="http://deathmarked.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/UR-The-Mirari-Conjecture.jpg" alt="" width="575" height="224" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-11761" srcset="https://deathmarked.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/UR-The-Mirari-Conjecture.jpg 575w, https://deathmarked.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/UR-The-Mirari-Conjecture-300x117.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 575px) 100vw, 575px" /><br />
Taking a short break from my office work and grad school write-ups, I decided to brew one Standard deck with the upcoming Core Set 2019. The deck’s main strategy revolved around the Blue Saga: The Mirari Conjecture and I saw one key card in M19 that will<span id="more-11758"></span> gain value on this strategy and is pretty impressive on my initial evaluation. The card is the reprinted Banefire, one of my favorites during the Shards of Alara days. The addition of this card in this deck theme gets you to win games more quickly and efficiently. </p>
<p><img alt="" loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="http://deathmarked.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Banefire-M19-1.png" alt="" width="250" height="349" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-11760" srcset="https://deathmarked.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Banefire-M19-1.png 250w, https://deathmarked.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Banefire-M19-1-215x300.png 215w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 250px) 100vw, 250px" /></p>
<p>Hence, here below is the initial version of Blue Red Mirrari Conjecture in M19 Standard. </p>
<p><em>Lands</em><br />
4 Spirebluff Canal<br />
4 Sulfur Falls<br />
2 Aether Hub<br />
2 Field of Ruin<br />
7 Island<br />
6 Mountain</p>
<p><em>Spells</em><br />
3 Abrade<br />
4 Banefire<br />
4 Disallow<br />
3 Lightning Strike<br />
4 Glimmer of Genius<br />
2 Magma Spray<br />
4 Hour of Devastation<br />
4 The Mirari Conjecture<br />
2 Divination<br />
1 Negate<br />
2 Essence Scatter<br />
2 Search for Azcanta<br />
<center><br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "ca-pub-2323336148464359";
/* Deathmarked content ad */
google_ad_slot = "1416605407";
google_ad_width = 300;
google_ad_height = 250;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script><br />
</center></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://deathmarked.info/quick-m19-decklist-blue-red-mirrari-conjecture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
